Kant-Studien Philosophische Zeitschrift der Kant-Gesellschaft, 91. Jahrgang, Heft 4, 2000
Edited by Manfred Baum, Bernd Dorflinger, Heiner Klemme, and Thomas M. Seebohm
The central problem for normative ethics is the conflict between a consequentialist view--that morality requires promoting the good of all--and a belief that the rights of the individual place significant constraints on what may be done to help others. Standard interpretations see Kant asrejecting all forms of consequentialism, and defending a theory which is fundamentally duty-based and agent-centered. Certain actions, like sacrificing the innocent, are categorically forbidden. In this original and controversial work, Cummiskey argues that there is no defensible basis for thisview, that Kant's own arguments actually entail a consequentialist conclusion. But this new form of consequentialism which follows from Kant's theories has a distinctly Kantian tone. The capacity of rational action is prior to the value of happiness; thus providing justification for the view thatrational nature is more important than mere pleasures and pains.
درجه (قاطیغوری(:
جلد:
91
کال:
2000
خپرندویه اداره:
Walter de Gruyter
ژبه:
german
صفحه:
138
ISBN 10:
3110169762
ISBN 13:
9783110169768
فایل:
DJVU, 17.98 MB
IPFS:
,
german, 2000